Parasite slithers into cold, indifferent world.

[Dazzler]

Princess Sparkle and Harry 'The Cuckoo' Hewitt have shat out a successor to lord it over the subjects of the Commonwealth in good time to push all those difficult headlines about corruption and greed burning the planet out of the news cycle. I won't bother linking to a story as I'm sure it's been forced down your throats endlessly.

I hope this one lives to see Buck House in ruins.

[slither]

LMAO!

I salute your resolute disdain for media saturation and admire your courage despite an inefficatious parliament and feckless royalty.


Cheers.

[MileHighDenver]

This one can wave an American Passport. Weird.

[smokedpeppers]

Princess Sparkle and Harry 'The Cuckoo' Hewitt

fizzing with excitement are we?

[slither]

I still find this funny.
I laughed out loud at the title - and then the hook: Princess Sparkle.

Well done.

But why use that particular verb?

[Rudy]

...and existentially speaking, why use it as a noun?

[slither]

I get where you’re trying to go with that. I do.
But I don’t think you quite get there.

[a bollocks]

princess Sparkle aka Princess Dazzler

[Dazzler]

I still find this funny.
I laughed out loud at the title - and then the hook: Princess Sparkle.

Well done.

But why use that particular verb?

Because it rhymes with Markle and she's the tawdriest tatmonger in the tawdry royal family?

It's a transparent attempt to make the monarchy look modern and relevant. It won't work and I truly feel for Ms. Markle having to put up with that ginger troll. I'm convinced that he has to be reminded to wash, and looks EXACTLY like Beavis.

[uk*bag*lady]

You don't think it could simply be that two young people met and fell in love?

Would that be so terrible?

:-)

[slither]

Oh please.
It was a shotgun wedding.

Very charming.

Like in Alabama - only here it was a B-grade Hollywood-meets-the-Royals story.

But will she learn the proper way to curtsy?

[Dazzler]

You don't think it could simply be that two young people met and fell in love?

Would that be so terrible?

:-)

I'm convinced that he saw her on the telly in Syoots and said "I want that one," and an aide was dispatched to the US to bring her back. There wouldn't have been any opposition to the marriage because Harry is not related to the rest of the royal family, being the product of Diana's lively libido and Prince Charles' notorious indifference to shagging.

[uk*bag*lady]

Aw, when did you become such a cynic D..

There is so little happy news about, why not just be glad for them?

:-)

[Dazzler]

Because we have to pay for them and are expected to bend a knee to them just because their ancestors killed the right people?

[uk*bag*lady]

But you can't blame that on these two young people.

Nor their days old child.

Can you?

:-)

[chigusa]

i can. and have.

a bloke bringing up some other buggers mistake and everyone knowing it is so council though.

[chigusa]

and i have it on good authority that they are all bloody lizards anyway. well, i say good authority...

[slither]

Cynics abound.

“Bend the knee.”
LMAO!

[slither]

Still yet:

What of Lady Gabriella - all those poor "lesser" Windsors?




LMAO!

[slither]

But what’s to be done with Princess Eugenie?

[Generous_J]

You don't think it could simply be that two young people met and fell in love?

Would that be so terrible?

:-)

I'm convinced that he saw her on the telly in Syoots and said "I want that one," and an aide was dispatched to the US to bring her back. There wouldn't have been any opposition to the marriage because Harry is not related to the rest of the royal family, being the product of Diana's lively libido and Prince Charles' notorious indifference to shagging.

He looks much more like Charles and William that he does Hewitt.